Advantage
First, is stability. Artificial grass has been developed from the first generation to the sixth generation of filled artificial grass, so it is relatively stable in technology and application.
Second, practicality. Filling with quartz sand and particles can maintain the straightness of the grass, increase the elasticity, maintain the directionality of the ball in motion, avoid uncertain factors during the game, and reduce the chance of players being injured in sports.
Disadvantages
First, maintenance costs are high. Everyone knows that the maintenance cost of filling artificial turf is mainly to supplement the filling to maintain the flatness of the court. If it is maintained once a week for 40 hours, especially for the fields with high practical frequency, the cost of such maintenance is also very large. overhead.
Third, the installation process is complicated. It is necessary to fill rubber particles and quartz sand, which increases the overall cost of the project. In addition, for some large venues such as 11-person venues, a particle filling machine is also required, and the sand filling machine also greatly increases the cost.
Fourth, security. Artificial grass is produced with environmentally friendly food-grade raw materials, which do not have safety problems, but rubber particles have many similar problems, so pay attention when choosing fillers.
So, is unfilled football grass more suitable for football fields or filled football grass? In fact, there is no definite answer to this. The choice is mainly based on the budget of the respective venue project, because 80% of the football fields on the market in China are filled type, and only 20% are filled-free, but the utilization rate of filling-free is increasing this year The trend is far more than the filling type.
