Nowadays, artificial turf is widely used, and with the continuous improvement of technology, there is no filling football grass. Now football field lawns are mainly divided into filled football grass and unfilled football grass, so do you know the advantages and disadvantages of filling and filling-free?
Non-fill artificial football field turf
Advantages
First, the cost is low. Fill-free artificial turf no longer needs to be filled with quartz sand and rubber environmental protection particles during the laying process like traditionally filled grass, which means that it saves customers a large part of the cost of filling accessories in the entire site (site construction costs). ), and the maintenance cost will not be increased in the later stage due to the lack of quartz sand and particles. Second, the paving is easy to move. It can be moved according to different needs, and will not affect the use of other venues, especially some indoor venues, which can quickly change venues (ball games and concerts). Third, the performance is good. The grass silk used in free-fill artificial turf is a high-density, heavy-weight mixed grass, so the wear resistance and resilience are better than other grass silks.
Disadvantages
First, it is easily damaged. Because the unfilled artificial turf lacks quartz sand and particles to protect the bottom and roots of the grass, it will be squeezed and stepped on by studs during long-term sports, which will easily damage the bottom. Second, fatigue. Generally, non-filled artificial turf will be paved with a layer of SEPP shock pad in order to improve elasticity and cushioning to improve sports performance. Because of the lack of padding, it is relatively soft to step on, which will cause a certain amount of foot fatigue after the athlete has exercised.
